Not too numerous? Not too many ideas to get the most out of these projects? Not enough? Not enough? It’s all in the name of making sense.
Non-systematic is a common word in the world of programming. Basically, it means that the code does not follow any sort of organized structure. Of course this is somewhat subjective as a lot of code just works one way… so they are not always the best. In this case, the code is not organized in any sort of way. The code is just code.
A lot of code is just code. If you think of it this way, any code can be broken down into manageable chunks of code. For example, if you write a code to run a particular function, you are not required to follow the code to the letter. If you write a code to change a specific value, you are not required to follow the code to the letter. If you write a code which changes several variables, you are not required to follow the code to the letter.
The idea here is that code can be broken down into manageable chunks of code, which are just code.
There are plenty of ways to break a code, but most methods that accomplish this task are not always “proper”. The problem is that once we break down a code into chunks of code, we have to follow the code in order. This becomes the basis for a lot of refactoring. Even when you do a lot of refactoring, you still have to follow all the parts of the code.
There are two things that make a code more readable and effective. The first is the use of good documentation. Good documentation is usually a key part of any code base that does a lot of refactoring. A great example of this is our own CMS. Whenever we have a code base that does a lot of refactoring, we take the time to document everything that we do, so that the person who uses the code base has a lot of documentation to go along with their code.
The second thing is to use the right level of indirection. With this in mind, our CMS has a lot of layers of indirection, so that the person who needs information doesn’t have to go to all the trouble of looking up the code to get it. Or rather, to get the code to the level of the person who needs the information.
This is a good example of a non-systematic approach. We take the time to document all the little things we do, so that the person who does the coding doesn’t have to look up everything by hand, but instead can just go to the documentation and find the answer.
Some people have suggested that we all use the same things, but that’s about as far as we can go. But that’s just me.
The only solution for this is to spend some time with the code and see if it actually works. There’s no point in doing this if you can’t get the code to run.
